American Laryngological Association
Guest of Honor Speech
Socioeconomic, Political, and Scientific Predictions for
Otolaryngology and Laryngology by the Year 2000
Paul H. Ward MD
Let me express my deep appreciation to our President, Dr. Byron Bailey, and
the American Laryngological Association for this happy occasion of being selected
Guest of Honor. My address is merely an appendage to President Bailey's. He
has asked me to gaze into my crystal ball and come up with some socioeconomic,
political, and scientific predictions for the next decade.
I'm reminded of the drunk who came home as the sun was rising. His wife
was irate and wanted to know where he had been. He informed her he came
home late in the evening, stopped to rest in the hammock, and fell asleep.
She said she had taken down the old hammock 3 weeks ago. His reply was, "Well,
that's my story and I'm sticking with it." What I am going to guess may
or may not occur, but it is my story and I'm going to stick with it! It
has about the same potential and may be as accurate or inaccurate as the
expensive think tank studies commissioned by the government and other private
organizations.
We now have almost 1/2 years of Clinton presidency under his and her
belts and a Congressional majority of Democrats in both the House and Senate.
The milieu is preset for the most dramatic changes in society since the
passage of the Social Security Act 60 years ago and that of Medicare in
1965. The President and Congress were elected upon their campaign promises
to fix the broken health care delivery system. A system that is excessively
expensive. A system where many of the poor have no access, where even the
employed middle class with medical problems are only a pink slip away from
the loss of their medical insurance because of a preexisting condition,
and where corporate employers who are responsible for their employees'
medical bills change their insurance carriers, leaving the employee without
access to his or her physicians.
No one, of course, knows what will happen to the Clintons' plan for universal
medical care, how it will be modified, or whether an alternate plan will
be submitted by Congress.
Health care consumed over 14% of our gross national product in 1993,
a figure predicted in 1989 to be reached in 1996. The current expenditure
is increasing by 1% of our GNP every 35 months. Currently, the major automotive
companies expend $750 to $1,000 on health insurance for every automobile
produced. The President feels health care reform is essential if we are
going to get our economy on the move again.
Passage of the Clinton plan or a modified version of a competitive managed
care plan appears probable unless a single-payer nationalized plan is passed
by Congress. I have a strong feeling that we will go through the experience
of a competitive managed care health process first. When the insurance
companies, health maintenance organizations, and other private health care
corporations have wrung the system dry, then we will witness buyouts, takeovers,
and failures of many corporations such as we saw with Maxi Care a few years
ago. At this point, with the difficult cost-cutting accomplished, the administration
and Congress will introduce and pass a single payer universal program.
These experiences have already happened in California and will soon happen
in your state. A single-payer initiative is already on the California ballot
for November.
Let me return to the main topic of how these socioeconomic changes impact
the future of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Since the government's
stated objective is to increase the number of primary care providers, which
include general physicians, internists, nurse practitioners, and physician's
assistants, the impact will be a programmed decrease in the numbers of
all practicing specialists, in our case otolaryngologist-head and neck
surgeons.
Your American Board of Otolaryngology is intensifying its manpower study
to provide reasonable estimates of the numbers of specialists in our field
who will be needed during the next decade based on prevalence of various
diseases and the number of physicians who will be practicing in the specialty
in the coming years. This also includes predicting how many residency positions
are needed to meet these expectations. These figures are expected to be
avail able this summer.
Well, here are my calculations based upon existing knowledge. There are
currently approximately 8,000 otolaryngologists, of which 6,000 are, board-certified.
Fourteen hundred otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons are currently
55 years old or older. Most of this group have established their retirement
nest eggs, likely will not adapt to the loss of autonomy, and abhor governmental
or corporate bureaucracy. I predict many of them will retire-something
we have already witnessed.
The 92 residency (some 5-year and others 6-year) programs produce around
262 residents yearly. This means there are approximately 1200 to 1300 residents
in the training pool. In some programs, particularly in the big Eastern
cities, residents serve primarily to provide service to indigent populations,
learning by experience with minimal supervision. As a matter of fact without
this care, many of the patients in the county, city, and veterans hospitals
would have even more difficulty than they currently experience in receiving
their basic care. This must be considered in our calculations. Will patients
with a Clinton Care Card still frequent their current service providers,
or will they enter the system through local primary care gatekeepers who
will refer them to their group's specialist? The latter appears more likely
and has the potential for tremendous changes in our training of students,
residents, and paramedical personnel and a shift in the characteristics
of our practice. The current 8,000 physicians (including residents) functioning
as otolaryngologists are excessive for the 257 million population that
is increasing at a projected 3 million per year. In order to meet the cost
cap, general physicians, nurse practitioners, technicians, and other less
experienced paramedical personnel will be trained to take care of sore
throats, colds, otitis media, and laryngitis. The primary care physicians
and others will remove cerumen, perform flexible and rigid telescopic examinations,
and perform biopsies on appropriate lesions of the head and neck.
We can assume that residents currently in training and most otolaryngologists
under 55 will work until age 65 or older because of lower-salaried incomes,
delayed acquisition of adequate retirement benefits, and anticipated greater
longevity.
According to my calculations, we will require only 5000 to 5500 otolaryngologists
to care for the expected 285 to 295 million population in the year 2004.
Residency positions must be reduced 30% to 35%, from 262 annually to
156 to 189. This is not cheerful news to residency directors and academicians
who rely heavily upon residents to help them care for patients in return
for teaching and research time. Since residency positions are primarily
paid for by governmental funds, limiting the positions funded easily controls
the numbers. Determining how and which residency positions and programs
are to be deleted is a more difficult problem. Problems with geographic
distribution of both primary care and specialist physicians will be solved
by differential incentive remuneration.
Some of these predictions sound dire to the older generation of practicing
otolaryngologists, but the specialty has blossomed into one of the most
dynamic in medicine. Almost three times the number of highly qualified
applicants seek residencies in otolaryngology as there are residency positions.
We can predict that the dynamic breadth of the field, from the microsurgery
of the ear, sinuses, and larynx to radical head and neck and reconstructive
surgery, will continue to expand. There will appear new innovative diagnostic
and therapeutic modalities almost beyond our imagination. Laryngology,
neurolaryngology, and voice diagnosis and therapy will emerge as a recognized
specialty.
The next decade is perhaps the most promising ever for all of medicine.
The current generation of young people entering medicine and otolaryngology
do so because of the new challenges. Their attitude is one of diminished
expectations for monetary rewards but with enhanced expectations and excitement
about current and developing technological, medical, and surgical advances.
The maturation and introduction of molecular biology offers the prevention
and correction of many genetic and acquired diseases through genetic engineering.
This past year the French reported completion of the genome bank, beating
out our national competitive efforts to be first. They have shared these
data with the world, and the next few years will provide the laborious
sequencing of the 100,000 genetic pieces. Gene therapy, genetic engineering,
and splicing already offer promise of prevention and correction of several
diseases (for example, cystic fibrosis). I predict we will finally see
prevention and cure of some head and neck cancers by this technology (viral-induced
papillomata and carcinoma of the larynx, congenital defects of the larynx
such as subglottic and tracheal stenosis).
Other positive aspects of the restructuring of the health care delivery
system as it applies to otolaryngology will be the elimination of most
ineffectual treatments, be they medical or surgical. Unnecessary surgery
and ineffectual medicines simply will not be paid for with our tax dollars.
Wasteful, inadequate, and inferior hospitals, medical schools, and residency
training programs will become extinct. The 6 year residency will be reduced
to 5 years. Residencies will be shortened to minimize lengthy, marginally
effective service requirements, and stress will be placed upon intensified
training. In the medical centers the teaching and education of medical
students, paramedical personnel, and residents will be elevated to a level
of recognition equal to research. The abundance of recently proliferating
preceptor fellowships will vanish.
Those who desire to go into otolaryngology-head and neck surgery will
find it even more competitive and will do so because of a specific desire
and love for the specialty. Those who continue on to more restricted fellowships
will do so in search of personal knowledge and satisfaction, since they
will receive little if any extra financial remuneration.
It seems safe to predict that like it or not, the private practice of
medicine as we have known it will cease. Patients will be cared for by
a pyramid of medical personnel providing basic medical care to all citizens
of our great nation. A few staunch physicians may hold out, as they have
with Medicare, and provide their services only to the wealthy. The wealthy
can always care for themselves, but our poor can no longer go without.
I continue to reassure the students and residents that physicians will
always be at the top of the heap. They deserve a good living for their
intellect and lengthy training. If they care for society, then society
will continue to care for and reward them. What is most important is to
contribute to the health and happiness of our fellow citizens. To seek
intellectual challenge and restore the confidence that has led to the high
esteem, respect, and prestige of physicians. We have a bright future. Let's
focus and work on making it better. I predict higher self-satisfaction
and greater freedom of time allotments with more time for family and other
personal activities.
In summary, what will be the overall effects of these changes? I believe
in the importance, dignity, and the art and science of otolaryngology-head
and neck surgery. Our place in American medicine is secure. William Faulkner,
in his 1950 Nobel laureate's address, addressing the fear and doom of a
nuclear holocaust that permeated society, stated, "I refuse to accept this.
I believe that man will not merely endure, he will prevail." Paraphrased,
I refuse to accept the decline of our devotion to the highest principles
of otolaryngology. I believe that they will not only endure but will prevail
and will continue to make us one of the most intellectually challenging
and dynamic fields of medicine. |